DivyaSree Shettigere master plan

No master plan has been published for this project. DivyaSree has released no drawing, and its own website does not list the development. What exists is a government filing that states, in numbers, the land, the buildings and their floors, the parking and the services. This page works from that filing, shows its own arithmetic, and says where the record stops. DivyaSree Yelahanka is useful for the site-planning lens because buyers should read open space, movement, parking, and amenity placement as everyday-use details, not brochure decoration.

DivyaSree Shettigere is the working title used on this site; DivyaSree has not announced a marketing name for the development.

The figures come from Terms of Reference application SIA/KA/INFRA2/568667/2026, filed with SEIAA Karnataka on 4 March 2026 by Divyasree Shelters LLP, a DivyaSree-group entity registered at DivyaSree Chambers, and from the SEIAA letter of 12 May 2026 granting the ToR. The building schedule, unit count and services are as filed for Terms of Reference, since the EC form itself is not publicly readable.

Two things matter most. First, status. Terms of Reference were granted on 12 May 2026 under File No. SEIAA 75 CON 2026, the scoping decision for the environmental impact study. The EC application, SIA/KA/INFRA2/580963/2026, filed on 20 June 2026, is pending before SEIAA Karnataka. No environmental clearance has been granted, and the project is not registered with K-RERA. Nothing on this page describes a permission.

Second, the file title says "residential" and the schedule does not. The filing also records a 252-room hotel building and a retail-and-office podium; DivyaSree has announced no operator or brand for either.

The land is sixteen survey numbers, most of them part-holdings: Sy. Nos. 1P, 37/2P, 37/5P, 37/6P, 37/8P, 37/9, 37/11P, 37/12, 37/16P, 37/17P, 37/24P, 37/25P, 37/27P, 39, 40 and 41/1 of Akkalenahalli-Mallenahalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru Rural (now Bengaluru North district). The CAF records it as privately owned, converted from agricultural use and acquired; 31.2519 hectares is 77.22 acres, the only site area we publish.

The promoter's boundary file describes a box about 774 m by 776 m, roughly 60 hectares against a declared 31.25, so the holding is irregular. We publish its centre, 13.19434, 77.66442, as the site pin, our own derivation.

The parcel is not empty ground. Part of the site is occupied by CISF staff quarters, which the environmental filing records as remaining in place until June 2028. Any construction programme has to work around that, and the intake material's indication of a launch targeted for late 2026 should be read in that light.

The site sits in the same survey block as Tata Housing's One Bangalore township and Birla Estates' Trimaya, both registered, launched projects whose roads and utilities arrive first. Godrej MSR City is about 0.5 km by road. The record does not say the land came from any of them. <!-- sister-link opportunity: tata-varnam --> <!-- sister-link opportunity: godrej-msr-city-phase-3 -->

The SEIAA letter recites the schedule: number, use and floor count. No position on the plot and no height in metres appears in the record.

Twelve of the sixteen residential buildings top out at the thirteenth upper floor; Building 13 is the tallest at ground plus 16 and Building 15 the lowest at ground plus 11. There is no single floor description for this scheme; a page giving one is quoting something other than the filing, as the FAQ page sets out.

One of the seventeen buildings holds no homes at all, and a second is only part residential. Neither has an operator, brand, floor area or position on the plot in the public record.

They matter because of distance. The nearest hospital, N.R.V. Hospital, is about 6.4 km by road; the nearest credible schools are about 8.2 km by road; there is no supermarket within 9 km by road. For 5,474 homes the podium is the filing's own answer to where residents will shop; whether it delivers depends on tenancies nobody has announced. The hotel draws on the same parking, plants and standby power as the homes, so every per-home figure below is stated before its share.

The filing gives the residential amenities their own buildings: Amenity 1 at one basement, ground and three upper floors; Amenity 2 and 3 at one basement, ground and two upper floors each. Three standalone amenity structures on one site is unusual, and it is filed; where they stand, and what they hold, is not. The amenity checklist in the intake material is a blank template, and we publish none of it.

All of this is our own arithmetic, and an estimate. 5,474 homes on 77.22 acres is 5,474 ÷ 77.22, about 70.9 homes per acre: dense for a 77-acre site, a vertical township rather than a garden estate. An even split across the sixteen residential buildings, 5,474 ÷ 16, is about 342 homes each, and 342 homes over 13 to 16 upper floors is about 20 to 26 homes per floor on the filed numbers. The filing states no such split; the estimate is a scale marker for how many homes share each lift core.

We deliberately do not divide the filed built-up area of 10,14,670.41 sq m by 5,474, and we do not divide the ₹2,029 crore project cost by anything. The built-up figure is gross, counting basements, hotel, podium, amenity buildings and plant; a per-home share would look like an apartment size, and a per-home cost like a price. There is no price. One ratio is fair as a measure of intensity: built-up area is about 3.25 times the 3,12,519.93 sq m parcel. That is not a floor area ratio; the plan sanction will count differently.

The filing records parking for 5,790 cars. Against 5,474 homes that is 5,790 ÷ 5,474, about 1.06 cars per home, before the hotel, the podium and the amenity buildings take a single space. It is thin for a township of this size. Allocation per home, and whether visitors, hotel guests and shoppers share the pool, is not on the record.

The letter records six sewage treatment plants of 650, 1,200, 1,100, 1,000, 350 and 300 KLD, which sum to the filed 4,600 KLD. Six plants rather than one points to a scheme treated in zones, though the filing records no phasing. Filed wastewater discharge is 4,167.91 KLD, leaving about 430 KLD, roughly 10 per cent, of headroom on our arithmetic. Total water demand is filed at about 4,900 KLD, fresh and recycled together. We publish no per-home figure from the 4,600 KLD, because the same six plants serve the hotel, the podium and the amenity buildings as well as the homes.

The fresh-water source is not on the filing; the intake material and the neighbouring registered project's record both point to gram-panchayat supply, and the intake material names BESCOM for power, attributions rather than findings.

Standby power is filed as diesel generator sets: five of 1,010 kVA, two of 750 kVA, fifteen of 625 kVA, fifteen of 500 kVA and ten of 250 kVA. That is forty-seven sets and 25,925 kVA on our sum; where each generator yard sits relative to the nearest bedroom is not on the record.

A granted Terms of Reference lists what the environmental impact study must demonstrate. These are requirements imposed, not features delivered. The study must show:

• tertiary treatment with 100 per cent recycling of sewage;
• solar generation on 50 per cent of the roof area;
• provision for electric-vehicle charging;
• rainwater harvesting and smart water metering;
• an organic-waste bio-digester;
• compliance with the Energy Conservation Building Code;
• a traffic study, which matters here: Terminal 1 of Kempegowda International Airport is 5.1 km away in a straight line but about 9.7 km by road, because the airfield perimeter and the access-controlled NH-44 lie between, and the nearest Blue Line metro station under construction, Doddajala, is about 3.1 km by road with no opening date announced;
• a disaster-management plan;
• a lake-water quality and rejuvenation plan for the nearby lake, which the condition does not name;
• and, in conditions 23 to 27, a salvage valuation of the existing buildings, environmental due diligence for the existing operations, and an impact-and-mitigation matrix with ISO 9613 noise modelling for the CISF staff residing on site until June 2028.

None is a promise; the EC decision will publish the answers as conditions of its own.

• No building positions, and no plan drawing of any kind.
• No unit mix; the intake material's tentative configuration table, self-labelled as pending RERA, sits on the floor-plans page with that label.
• No phasing and no completion date.
• No heights in metres, setbacks, open-space figures or floor areas.
• No plan sanction number, and no confirmation that the ToR-stage programme survived unchanged into the EC application.

A K-RERA registration will supply most of this: a real unit mix with carpet areas, the plan sanction reference, phasing with completion dates, and the lawful status to market. Until then any drawing presented as this project's master plan is an artist's impression.

The parcel lies in Devanahalli Taluk of Bengaluru Rural, renamed Bengaluru North district in 2025, outside the Greater Bengaluru Authority, whose boundary is about 8 km to the south-west. Plan sanction comes from BIAAPA (Bengaluru International Airport Area Planning Authority), which the registered neighbour on the same survey numbers names in its K-RERA record; none has been issued for this project. Expect a panchayat e-khata and panchayat property tax: the neighbour's record carries a Panchayat Raj e-khata on Sy. 1(P) and names Anneshwara Gram Panchayat as water authority, at pincode 562157. Confirm the khata class on the specific survey numbers.

DivyaSree Shettigere is not registered with the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority, and no application is pending. Section 3 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016 bars a project in a registrable class from being advertised, marketed, booked or sold before registration. This microsite is an information and enquiry resource, not a booking channel; no unit, allotment or price can be agreed at present.

DivyaSree has released no renders, elevations or photographs for this project. Every image below is an indicative visualisation commissioned for this site to illustrate the filed programme. None of them is a developer drawing, and none should be read as a specification.